
Discover the key differences between Minimum Viable Product (MVP) and Minimum Lovable Product (MLP). Learn why "viable" is no longer enough, and how building lovable products leads to stronger user loyalty and growth.
Is building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) still enough to stand out in today’s competitive landscape? For years, MVP has been the go-to strategy for startups and established companies alike—focus on the core, launch quickly, and learn fast. But as users become more discerning and competition intensifies, the traditional MVP may fall short of delivering real value or loyalty.
That’s where the Minimum Lovable Product (MLP) comes in. MLP goes beyond just "viable"—it aims to delight early adopters, create emotional connections, and lay a stronger foundation for growth. In this comprehensive guide, you’ll learn:
If you want your product to do more than just survive—if you want it to thrive—read on to discover the best approach for modern product development.
The Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is the most basic version of a product that allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort. It includes only the core features necessary to solve a specific problem for early adopters.
MVP gained traction because it enables businesses to:
Key takeaway: MVP is about learning fast, not about being perfect. It’s a strategy rooted in efficiency and risk mitigation.
The Minimum Lovable Product (MLP) is the smallest set of features that not only solves a core user problem but also delights your target audience. While MVP asks "What can we build to test our hypothesis?", MLP asks "What will make users fall in love with our product from day one?"
MLP is becoming the preferred approach because it:
Statistic: Products that create an emotional connection with users are 2x more likely to achieve long-term success (Forrester).
The core distinction between MVP and MLP is the user experience they deliver:
Consider the following examples:
With MVP, you prioritize speed and risk reduction. You learn what users want, but you might risk negative first impressions. With MLP, you take a bit more time to craft a memorable experience, potentially increasing initial investment but also boosting retention and advocacy.
Today’s users have higher standards. They expect intuitive design, seamless functionality, and emotional engagement—even from early-stage products. Launching an MVP that feels "unfinished" may result in poor reviews, low retention, or being ignored entirely.
With so many alternatives just a click away, products that don’t stand out risk being overlooked. Focusing only on "viability" can mean missing out on what turns users into fans.
Expert tip: Don’t just build what’s necessary—build what’s memorable. Your earliest users are your most important advocates.
Choose an MVP approach when:
Choose MLP when:
For a step-by-step guide on creating an MVP, see how to build an MVP product and attract your first customers.
Go beyond demographics. Interview users, observe their behavior, and identify pain points and delights.
Ask: What’s the one thing that will make users rave about your product? Prioritize features that spark joy or solve a problem in a unique way.
Create interactive prototypes to test your ideas. Gather feedback early and often to refine the user experience.
Design for delight—animations, micro-interactions, and copywriting all matter. Even small touches can make a product lovable.
Ship your MLP, but keep improving based on real-world feedback. Your first "lovable" product is just the beginning.
Remember, an MVP is for learning—not for scaling. Don’t neglect further development and polish.
Even the best MVPs can fail if users aren’t excited or engaged. Always seek to create delight, even in small ways.
Don’t confuse "lovable" with "feature-heavy." Focus on quality and emotional impact, not quantity of features.
Instagram’s MVP was simple photo sharing. Its MLP? Beautiful filters and a seamless user experience that made sharing photos delightful and addictive.
Dropbox started with a demo video (MVP) to validate demand. Its MLP included effortless syncing and a visually pleasing interface, making file sharing enjoyable.
Slack’s MVP was basic team messaging; their MLP added playful notifications, integrations, and an intuitive design that teams loved.
Airbnb’s MVP simply listed air mattresses for rent. Its MLP focused on trust, community, and beautiful photos—transforming the way people travel.
Spotify’s MVP allowed music streaming. Its MLP delivered personalized playlists, social sharing, and a polished interface.
Trello’s MVP let users create boards and lists. Its MLP included engaging animations and seamless drag-and-drop, which users loved.
Calendly’s MVP solved scheduling. Its MLP made it delightful with a clean interface and thoughtful reminders.
Notion’s MVP was a simple note-taking tool. Its MLP became a customizable, beautiful workspace that users felt connected to.
Duolingo’s MVP was basic language exercises. Its MLP added gamification and fun animations that kept learners coming back.
Figma’s MVP enabled basic interface design. Its MLP turned it into a collaborative, real-time platform designers loved to use.
Decide what matters most—speed, risk reduction, or user delight. Align your choice with your company’s objectives.
Even with MLP, keep initial scope manageable. Focus on a handful of "wow" features before expanding.
Track not just usage, but also user satisfaction and emotional responses. Use surveys, NPS, and user interviews.
Pro tip: A great MLP can turn early users into passionate advocates, fueling organic growth.
For more on modern product development and cross-platform tools, read how Qt streamlines modern GUI development.
Not always. If you’re entering uncharted territory or have severe constraints, an MVP is often the best starting point. But if user retention and word-of-mouth are key, MLP can give you a stronger edge.
When you’ve achieved product-market fit and validated demand, shift your focus to delighting users and building loyalty—transitioning from MVP to MLP.
Absolutely. Many successful products start with an MVP, then rapidly evolve into an MLP as they learn from users.
As markets mature and users demand more, the Minimum Lovable Product is becoming the new standard. Teams will be expected to deliver not just working products, but delightful experiences from day one.
Those who embrace MLP thinking early will find it easier to build loyal communities, achieve viral growth, and stand out in crowded markets. The era of "just viable" is giving way to the era of "truly lovable."
Curious how to solve modern development challenges? Explore cross-platform product development strategies for more insights.
Choosing between MVP and MLP depends on your goals, market, and resources. MVP helps you learn fast and minimize risk, but may not engage or retain users. MLP takes user delight seriously, creating products people love and share. In today’s landscape, MLP is often the better path for lasting impact. Start with "viable," but aim for "lovable"—and your product will have a much greater chance of success.
Ready to build a product users adore? Start with empathy, focus on delight, and never settle for "just enough."